Bond
Duration is a constitutive condition.
Without persistence from one exchange to the next, there is contact or a query, not a bond.
Generative Change Management (GChM) studies how organizations can align human judgment and sophisticated nonhuman capabilities under the same strategic objective.
The generative attributional bond is a sustained coupling between a person and a responsive artificial system.
Duration is a constitutive condition.
Without persistence from one exchange to the next, there is contact or a query, not a bond.
The person attributes understanding, attention, or judgment to the system, and the system takes part through its responses.
The reciprocity is functional and asymmetric.
“Generative” refers to the transformations the bond produces over time, not to the technical capacity of generative AI to produce outputs.
The Generative Attributional Bond: Conceptual Foundations for a Generative Sociology
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20749140Read paper: The Generative Attributional Bond: Conceptual Foundations for a Generative Sociology (opens in a new tab)GChM studies how organizations can turn access to AI into a distinctive collective capability.
The capabilities to formulate and address problems that form during human–algorithmic work.
They expand what the participants could conceive or carry out separately.
The innovative capacity that emerges from human–algorithmic coexistence to develop original, relevant responses for specific recipients.
Competitiveness implies comparison: a response is judged against the available alternatives, including continuing what you do today.
Three operations are addressed together, because any one of them alone can change the work without changing the organization.
Expansion is recognized when the productive unit can conceive or carry out something that was not available in an identifiable prior situation.
Reorganizing the relationships among those who formulate problems, develop proposals, decide, execute, and review.
Adding agents helps only when the new composition makes something new possible.
Reconstructing the contributions, decisions, and delegations behind a piece of work, and identifying who can intervene and answer for its consequences.
The capability, arising from human–algorithmic coexistence, to provide distinctive responses suited to the demands of specific recipients, such as customers, users, communities, or institutions. It sits at the center as the common direction of the three dimensions and their emergents.
Objective · Creative capability
Centers on professional contribution. Creative capability expands professional boundaries and enables innovative contributions with traceable authorial responsibility.
Objective · Adaptive productivity
Addresses production organization and integrates human capabilities with digital units. Adaptive productivity makes it possible to change the composition, locations, and timing of production in response to demands.
Objective · Hybrid intelligence
Focuses on the project's direction and the organization's culture. Hybrid intelligence guides organizational development by bringing human and algorithmic capabilities together to imagine possible futures, make decisions, and build a shared project.
The distinctive ways a production unit conceives and produces solutions by integrating expanded professional contributions with the production organization that enables them. Its distinctiveness lies in how it frames problems and combines capabilities to address them.
It redefines what a person can contribute to the organizational project through human–algorithmic coexistence.
The meanings, relationships, and forms of belonging that take shape when algorithmic participation is integrated into an organizational project. It includes shared criteria for what counts as a valid contribution, how contributors are recognized, and the place of artificial entities in the organization's knowledge, decisions, and identity.
Generative Change Management: Emergent Intelligence and Hybrid Competitiveness
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23086876Read paper: Generative Change Management: Emergent Intelligence and Hybrid Competitiveness (opens in a new tab)The same intervention pattern applies across scales.
Participants, resources, and demands change at each scale. The three operations of the intervention core and the relationships among dimensions remain the same. Each intervention focuses on the axes relevant to a situation, and its effects are examined across all three dimensions.
Generative Change Management: Emergent Intelligence and Hybrid Competitiveness
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23086876Read paper: Generative Change Management: Emergent Intelligence and Hybrid Competitiveness (opens in a new tab)Hybrid Competitiveness: Managing Human–Algorithmic Coexistence in Organizations
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23089623Read paper: Hybrid Competitiveness: Managing Human–Algorithmic Coexistence in Organizations (opens in a new tab)Generative Change Management: Foundational Concepts for Human-AI Hybrid Productivity in Organizations
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22033562Read paper: Generative Change Management: Foundational Concepts for Human-AI Hybrid Productivity in Organizations (opens in a new tab)Generative Change Management: A Pedagogical Proposal for Human-AI Hybrid Productivity and Competitiveness
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22036251Read paper: Generative Change Management: A Pedagogical Proposal for Human-AI Hybrid Productivity and Competitiveness (opens in a new tab)The Generative Attributional Bond: Conceptual Foundations for a Generative Sociology
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20749140Read paper: The Generative Attributional Bond: Conceptual Foundations for a Generative Sociology (opens in a new tab)